× Linear Transformation Multiplicity Dual Space Minimal Polynomial \(T\)-Complement Cyclic Operator Indecomposable Operator Characteristic Polynomial Diagonalizable Smith Normal Form Normal Subgroup Isomorphism Center Centralizer Normalizer Stabilizer Orbit \(p\)-group Sylow \(p\)-Subgroup Sylow's Theorem Simple Group Solvable Group Field Integral Domain Ascending Chain Condition Principal Ideal Domain Unique Factorization Domain Polynomial Ring Division Algorithm in SageMath Prime and Irreducible Adjoining Element Splitting Field Minimal Polynomial Field Extension Separable Algebraic Closure Galois Group Galois Theory KU 2015 (January) KU 2015 (August) KU 2016 (January) KU 2016 (August) KU 2017 (January) KU 2017 (August) KU 2018 (January) KU 2018 (August) KU 2019 (January) KU 2019 (August) KU 2020 (January) KU 2020 (August) KU 2021 (January) KU 2021 (August) KU 2022 (January) KU 2022 (August) KU 2023 (January) KU 2023 (August) KU 2024 (January)
☰ Menu

KU 2018 (August) Algebra Qualifying Exam

My name is Hanzhang Yin, and I have developed this website as a resource to facilitate the review of key concepts in abstract algebra, and it is not fully completed. Feel free to email me at hanyin@ku.edu if there are any errors or suggestions for improvement.

2. For each of the following, provide a proof if the statement is correct or provide a counter-example or justification, if the statement is false.

(a) Let \( A \) denote the ring of continuous real-valued functions on the open unit interval \( (0, 1) \). For \( 0 < \alpha < 1 \), let \( I_\alpha=\{ f \in A \mid f(\alpha)=0 \} \).

  • (i) Is \( I_\alpha \) a maximal ideal?
  • (ii) Is \( I_{1/2} \cap I_{\pi/4} \) a prime ideal?
  • (iii) Is \( (0) \) a prime ideal?

(b) Is the ideal \( \langle 2, x^2 + x + 1 \rangle \) in \( \mathbb{Z}[x] \) a maximal ideal?

(c) Is the ideal generated by the class of \( x \) in the quotient ring \( \mathbb{C}[x, y] / \langle xy \rangle \) prime?

Solution (ii). \(I_{1/2} \cap I_{\pi/4} = \{ f \in A \mid f(1/2) = 0 \text{ and } f(\pi/4) = 0 \}\), which is not a prime ideal. Let \[ \begin{align} f(x) &= |x - 1/2|, \\ g(x) &= |x - \pi/4|. \end{align} \] Thus, we can know that both \(f(x)\) and \(g(x)\) are continuous real function and Hence, we can know that \(f(x)\cdot g(x)\in I_{1/2} \cap I_{\pi/4}\), but \(f(x)\) and \(g(x)\) are not in \(I_{1/2}\cap I_{\pi/4}\).

Solution (b). \(\langle 2, x^2 + x + 1 \rangle\) is a maximal ideal.

Proof.Since \(\mathbb{Z}[x]\) has division algorithm, we can know if \(p(x)\in \mathbb{Z}[x]\), then we have \[ p(x) = q(x)(x^2 + x + 1) + r(x), \text{ where } \deg(r(x)) < \deg(x^2 + x + 1). \] In other words, \(r(x)=ax + b\), where \(a, b\in \mathbb{Z}\). Since \(2\in \langle 2, x^2 + x + 1\rangle\), we can know that \(r(x)=ax + b\) only has three possibilities: \(r(x)=0, r(x)=x, r(x)=1, r(x)=x+1\). Thus, we have \[ \mathbb{Z}[x]/\langle 2, x^2 + x + 1\rangle=\{0, 1, x, x + 1\}. \] And \(x(x + 1)=x^2 + x=-1=1\), which implies that \(x\) and \(x + 1\) are units. Thus, we can see that \(\langle 2, x^2 + x + 1\rangle\) is a maximal ideal. \(\blacksquare\)

Solution (c). The ideal generated by the class of \(x\) in the quotient ring \(\mathbb{C}[x, y]/\langle xy\rangle\) is a prime ideal.

Proof. We can know that \(\mathbb{C}[x, y]/\langle xy\rangle = \{a_nx^n + \dots + a_1x + b_my^m + \dots + b_1y + c + \langle xy\rangle \mid a_i, b_j, c\in \mathbb{C}\}\). For \(\langle x\rangle\subset \mathbb{C}[x, y]/\langle xy\rangle\), we have \[ \begin{align} \langle x \rangle + \langle xy \rangle &= \{x(a_nx^n + \dots + a_1x + b_my^m + \dots + b_1y + c) + \langle xy\rangle \mid a_i, b_j, c\in \mathbb{C}\}, \\ &= \{a_nx^{n+1} + \dots + a_1x^2 + b_my^mx + \dots + b_1yx + cx + \langle xy\rangle \mid a_i, b_j, c\in \mathbb{C}\}, \\ &= \{a_nx^{n+1} + \dots + a_1x^2 + cx + \langle xy\rangle \mid a_i, c\in \mathbb{C}\}, \\ &= \{a_nx^{n} + \dots + a_1x + \langle xy\rangle \mid a_i\in \mathbb{C}\}. \end{align} \] Then, we denote \(R = \mathbb{C}[x, y]/\langle xy\rangle\). Thus, we have \[ R/\langle x\rangle = \{b_my^m + b_{m-1}y^{m-1} + \dots b_1y + b_0 + \langle xy\rangle \mid b_i\in \mathbb{C}\} \cong \mathbb{C}[y]. \] Since \(\mathbb{C}[y]\) is a PID, which is an integral domain. Hence, we can know that \(\langle x\rangle\) is a prime ideal.


3. Let \( F = \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} \) denote the field with two elements and set \( f(x) = x^5 + x^2 + 1 \in F[x] \).

(a) Show that \( f(x) \) is irreducible over \( F \).

(b) Let \( \alpha \) be a root of \( f(x) \) in some larger field. Express the element \( \alpha \cdot (\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1)^{-1} \) in \( F(\alpha) \) as a polynomial in \( \alpha \) over \( F \) of minimal degree.

Proof (a). We will show that \(f(x)\) is irreducible over \(F\) by contradiction. Suppose that \(f(x)\) is reducible over \(F\). Then we have two possibilities: \[ \begin{align} f(x) &= (x + a)(x^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 + dx + e),\\ f(x) &= (x^2 + ax + b)(x^3 + cx^2 + dx + e).\\ \end{align} \] For the first case, we can know that \(f(x)\) has a root in \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\). However, \(f(0) = 0^5 + 0^2 + 1 = 1\) and \(f(1) = 1^5 + 1^2 + 1 = 1\), which implies that \(f(x)\) has no root in \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\). Hence, it leaves us with the second case. Then we have \[ \begin{align} f(x) &= (x^2 + ax + b)(x^3 + cx^2 + dx + e)\\ &= x^5 + (a + c)x^4 + (b + ac + d)x^3 + (ad + bc + e)x^2 + (ae + bd)x + be. &= x^5 + x^2 + 1. \end{align} \] Then we have \[ \begin{align} be &= 1, \\ ae + bd &= 0, \\ ad + bc + e &= 1, \\ b + ac + d &= 0, \\ a + c &= 0. \end{align} \] Since \(be = 1\), we can have \(b = e = 1\). Then we rewrite the above equations as \[ \begin{align} a + c &= 0, \\ 1 + ac +d &= 0, \\ ad + c + 1 &= 1, \\ a + d &= 0. \end{align} \] Since \(a + c = 0\) and \(a, c\in \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\), we can know that \(a = e\). By the similar reason, since \(a + d = 0\), we have \(a = d\). Now, we can know that \(a = c = d\), and we replace \(c\) and \(d\) with \(a\) and get \[ \begin{align} 1 + a^2 + a &= 0, \\ a^2 + a + 1 &= 1. \\ \end{align} \] Now, we see that \(a^2 + a + 1 \neq a^2 + a + 1\), which is a contradiction. Therefore, we can conclude that \(f(x)\) is irreducible over \(F\). \(\blacksquare\)

Solution (b). Firstly, we know that \(\alpha^5 + \alpha^2 + 1 = 0\). Hence, we have \[ \begin{align} \alpha^5 + \alpha^2 &= -1 = 1, \\ \alpha(\alpha^4 + \alpha) &= 1. \\ \end{align} \] Thus, we can \(\alpha^{-1} = \alpha^4 + \alpha\). Meanwhile, we have \[ \begin{align} \alpha^5 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + 1 &= \alpha \\ \alpha^5 + \alpha^2 + \alpha &= \alpha - 1 = \alpha + 1 \\ \alpha(\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1) &= \alpha + 1 \\ (\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1) &= \dfrac{\alpha + 1}{\alpha} \\ (\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1)^{-1} &= \dfrac{\alpha}{\alpha + 1} = \alpha(\alpha + 1)^{-1} \\ \end{align} \] It shows that we need to find \(\alpha(\alpha + 1)^{-1}\). Given that \[ \begin{align} (\alpha + 1)(\alpha + 1) &= \alpha^2 + 2\alpha + 1 = \alpha^2 + 1 = \alpha^5 \\ (\alpha + 1)\dfrac{\alpha + 1}{\alpha^5} &= (\alpha + 1)(\alpha + 1)(\alpha^5)^{-1} = 1. \end{align} \] Since we know that \(\alpha^{-1} = \alpha^4 + \alpha\), we have \[ \begin{align} (\alpha^5)^{-1} &= (\alpha^{-1})^{5} \\ &= (\alpha^4 + \alpha)^5 = \alpha^5(\alpha^3 + 1)^5 = (\alpha^2 + 1)\cdot (\alpha^3 + 1)^4\cdot (\alpha^3 + 1) \\ &= (\alpha^2 + 1)(\alpha^3 + 1)(\alpha^3 + 1)^2(\alpha^3 + 1)^2 \\ &= (\alpha^5 + \alpha^2 + \alpha^3 + 1)(\alpha^6 + 1)^2 \\ &= (\alpha^3)(\alpha^{12} + 1) \\ &= \alpha^3(\alpha^5\cdot \alpha^5\cdot \alpha^2 + 1) \\ &= \alpha^3((\alpha^2 + 1)^2\cdot \alpha^2 + 1) \\ &= \alpha^3(\alpha^6 + \alpha^2 + 1) \\ &= \alpha^3(\alpha\cdot \alpha^5 + \alpha^2 + 1) \\ &= \alpha^3(\alpha(\alpha^2 + 1) + \alpha^2 + 1) \\ &= \alpha^3(\alpha^3 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + 1) \\ &= \alpha^6 + \alpha^5 + \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 \\ &= \alpha(\alpha^2 + 1) + \alpha^2 + 1 + \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 \\ &= \alpha^3 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + 1 + \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 \\ &= \alpha^4 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + 1 \\ \end{align} \] Thus, we can know that \[ \begin{align} (\alpha + 1)\cdot(\alpha^5)^{-1} &= (\alpha + 1)\cdot (\alpha^4 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + 1) \\ &= \alpha^5 + \alpha^3 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + \alpha^4 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + 1 \\ &= \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 + \alpha^2. \end{align} \] Hence, the inverse of \(\alpha + 1\) is \(\alpha^4 + \alpha^3 + \alpha^2 \). Now, we can know that \[ \begin{align} (\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1)^{-1} &= \alpha(\alpha + 1)^{-1} = \alpha(\alpha^4 + \alpha^3 + \alpha^2) = \alpha^5 + \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 = \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 + \alpha^2 + 1.\\ \alpha(\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1)^{-1} &= \alpha(\alpha^4 + \alpha^3 + \alpha^2 + 1) = \alpha^5 + \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 + \alpha = \alpha^4 + \alpha^3 + \alpha^2 + \alpha + 1. \\ \end{align} \]


4. Let \( p > 0 \) be a prime number and set \( F := \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} \), the field with \( p \) elements. Find the number of \( 2 \times 2 \) matrices with entries in \( F \) such that \( A^2 = I \).

Solution. Given that \(A^2 = I\), we have \(A^2 - I = 0\). Hence, we set \(f(x) = x^2 - 1 = (x - 1)(x + 1)\). Then, we have \(f(A) = 0\). Thus, we can know that the minimal polynomial of \(A\), \(\mu_A(x)\), divides \(f(x)\). Hence, we have three possibilities: \(x - 1\) or \(x + 1\) or \(f(x)\). If the minimal polynomial of \(A\) is \(x - 1\), then we can have \(A - I = 0\), which means that \(A = I\). If the minimal polynomial of \(A\) is \(x + 1\), then we can have \(A + I = 0\), which means that \(A = -I = (p - 1)I\). If \(p = 2\), then we can know that \(A = I\) is the solution for both case where \(\mu_A(x) = x - 1\) and \(\mu_A(x) = x + 1\). If \(\mu_A(x) = (x - 1)(x + 1)\), then we can know that \(\gcd(x - 1, x + 1) = 1\), when \(p>2\). Hence, we can have two eigenvalues, which are \(1\) and \(p - 1\). And \(F^2 = \ker(A - I) \oplus \ker(A + I)\). Then, we can know that \(A\) is diagonalizable over \(F\). Thus, we can write \(A = PDP^{-1}\), where \[ D = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & p - 1 \\ \end{bmatrix}. \] And \(P\) is an invertible matrix with entries in \(F\). Denote \(P = [\vec{v_1}, \vec{v_2}]\), where \(\vec{v_1}\) and \(\vec{v_2}\) are the eigenvectors of \(A\). Besides, that \(\vec{v_1}, \vec{v_2}\) should be independent. Hence, for \(\vec{v_1}\in F^2\), we can know that it cannot be \(0\). Thus, there are \(p^2 - 1\) choices for \(\vec{v_1}\). For \(\vec{v_2}\in F^2\), we can know that it cannot be a multiple of \(\vec{v_1}\). Hence, there are \(p^2 - p\) choices for \(\vec{v_2}\). Then, we will have \((p^2 - 1)(p^2 - p)\) choices for \(P\). Hence, the number of \(2 \times 2\) matrices with entries in \(F\) such that \(A^2 = I\) is \(2 + (p^2 - 1)(p^2 - p)\) when \(p > 2\). When \(p=2\), there is only one matrix, which is the identity one.